7 thoughts on “A First-Class Workman Is Never Satisfied With Second-Class Tools”
@Michael: well, both! ;)
Well, it might be jewels then, not tools.
oh, mine not a comment in the direction of feminism, but trying to make a veiled reference to the tool part, LOL. If you get my drift.
:)
Mike – Cool! Chava – A sign of the times it was written.
how about a first class woman? Same same.
I notice copyright 1889 – I was looking at an old try square I inherited from my grandfather, it turns out to have been made in Sheffield, England in the 1840’s (through the power of Google) – even found the different craftspeople responsible for the brass, the rosewood, and the steel parts
@Michael: well, both! ;)
Well, it might be jewels then, not tools.
oh, mine not a comment in the direction of feminism, but trying to make a veiled reference to the tool part, LOL. If you get my drift.
:)
Mike – Cool!
Chava – A sign of the times it was written.
how about a first class woman? Same same.
I notice copyright 1889 – I was looking at an old try square I inherited from my grandfather, it turns out to have been made in Sheffield, England in the 1840’s (through the power of Google) – even found the different craftspeople responsible for the brass, the rosewood, and the steel parts