7 thoughts on “A First-Class Workman Is Never Satisfied With Second-Class Tools”
@Michael: well, both! 😉
Well, it might be jewels then, not tools.
oh, mine not a comment in the direction of feminism, but trying to make a veiled reference to the tool part, LOL. If you get my drift.
🙂
Mike – Cool! Chava – A sign of the times it was written.
how about a first class woman? Same same.
I notice copyright 1889 – I was looking at an old try square I inherited from my grandfather, it turns out to have been made in Sheffield, England in the 1840’s (through the power of Google) – even found the different craftspeople responsible for the brass, the rosewood, and the steel parts
Comments are closed.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
@Michael: well, both! 😉
Well, it might be jewels then, not tools.
oh, mine not a comment in the direction of feminism, but trying to make a veiled reference to the tool part, LOL. If you get my drift.
🙂
Mike – Cool!
Chava – A sign of the times it was written.
how about a first class woman? Same same.
I notice copyright 1889 – I was looking at an old try square I inherited from my grandfather, it turns out to have been made in Sheffield, England in the 1840’s (through the power of Google) – even found the different craftspeople responsible for the brass, the rosewood, and the steel parts